with the kind assistance of Mietmäuler particularly in the publicly owned media institutions.
was announced yesterday on all channels that the income tax would be reduced and "relieved" by taxpayers to "up to" 36 € a year or 3 € a month would. Any merchant who offers goods on his Grabbeltisch from 1 €, in which then only to find parts from 5 € are is more honest than these propagandists.
would get the 3 € a month tax payers who would pay the maximum tax rate and advertising costs under 920 euros in its tax return identifies. Of course, these taxpayers, there they exist, a rarity. And then this minimal increase in expenses will also be sold as a tax simplification. Delicious? Or rather an impertinence?
Unfortunately people are not aware that the state each worker cheating just in the advertising costs for decades. With the blessing of the alleged constitutional protectors - of course!
The expenses associated with the commencement of employment, the employee can only make the journey to the work maintains that the return is a "private matter". Strange thing is that accidents also insured during the return trip are. But perhaps since even a "reform" plan.
first since 2010 for health insurance contributions reduce the taxable income. Over 60 years of tax fraud in the workforce, the Constitutional Court Certainly every always recognized as "law". wanted to pay only when a privately insured person to the health insurance for his children, no taxes, because the judges saw action.
In the same vein, the Constitutional Court ruled on the taxation of pension contributions. Only when an officer who himself had never paid a cent / penny in his retirement / pension, complained about the tax on his pension, as decided the "court", the rent would be taxed and not the contributions. But it acknowledged the legislature a period of more than 25 years to change that.
are therefore taxable pension contributions each year a little less and the benefits will be taxed.
The mathematical geniuses of the Constitutional Court argued, however, in your opinion seriously, that the pensioner's only 50 percent of his pension contributions was taxed, and for this reason he must nachversteuern 50 percent (with each year more).
The contributors, however, were taxed during the working period, the pension contributions with the highest tax rate (progression) and the even decades in advance. The majority of pensioners also get such a paltry pension, that it no tax can be levied. For this reason, of course, also required a long transition period. More than 20 billion were / are the workers so drawn each year from his pocket.
Unfortunately, not only constitutional judges mathematical laymen, and even the majority of the contributors belong to this category - which I doubt for the judges, at least their advisers should be able to be expected. It is therefore a deliberate deception of the pension contributors.
On WDR2 yesterday was again a possible Pension increase of 1 percent held. At the same time, it was reported that the Pension Fund resulting surplus, which must lead to a reduction in the pension contribution. After so many years, the propaganda of priceless pension contributions was drummed - such a message!
who seriously asks what means a pension increase of one percent will notice that this means in reality a smaller pension. Even if the inflation would amount to only 1.7 percent, this would be a loss in value of the pension of 0.7 percent. In truth, the inflation rate for pensioners (that is, the median income for up to 1,000 €) is much higher.
But this 1 percent "increase" affects not only the pensioners. Unfortunately, the contributors to the majority has still not understood that this applies also to its paid-up pension contributions. There may be people that invest their money for 1 percent. In the Riester pension, the legislature is, however a minimum of 2.25 percent. But this scam, the "constitutional court" somehow justified, should someone dare to perform it in a constitutional challenge to the court.
Of course, the reference should be on the 2.25 percent return of the "Riester pension" no recommendation for the Riester pension. Without the billions of subsidies from tax revenues would not exist pension. The 2.25 percent shall also not the Riester-savers of exceptions, the 100 years and older, apart. The profit of the insurance or make better their owners and the financial industry. If it goes wrong, then the pension is gone. In the United States and even in England, the result can be seen today!
who expects a little bit, will find no great calculation skills that the value of pension contributions in just the last 20 years has fallen, taking account of inflation by more than 10 percent. And only the official rate of inflation is taken into account!
If social organizations rant about the fact that the poverty rate among pensioners in 2020 to increase to over 10 percent, then the interested reader should again look at the statistics of the BFA. The average rent is already below the poverty line. Many retirees who would now be entitled to subscribe for social money actually go, not go to office. to conclude from this, there would be no significant poverty is worst propaganda. Already have 16 percent of retirees are designated as poor. 2020, there will be far more than 30 percent.
News is now publicly against the officials or their pension amount - denounced - the Mietmäuler in the media. And the pension contributors is reminded that his pension for a maximum of 41 percent of final salary lie is (so he is not the last few years was out of work) during the official 71 percent of "pocketing".
And the "shitty" pension payer will of course require the pub, that the salaries of civil servants will be reduced to demand rather than an increase in his pension.
I can not think this is really nothing more a -
;-) Addendum:
http://www.isor-sozialverein.de/Rentendaten/wie_berechne_ich_rente_neue_bundesl% E4nder.pdf
Under this link you can look at a couple facts the theft and fraud in the pension make obvious. They do not even bother to conceal the fraud, except with stupid sayings.
Who in 2006, paid at an average salary of 26,400 € 5148 € in the pension fund to acquire a monthly pension of € 24.65. To get paid only the amount paid for the pension contribution, this would have to contributors 82 and 84 years old, depending on whether it reaches 65 or at 67 the retirement age.
The average life expectancy for men is 76 years and has declined slightly, even if the propaganda says otherwise.
Under the same link geschwafelt However, despite these clear data about a return of 4 percent for pension contributions. Similar nonsense spread even Nachdenkseiten.
From 1998 to 2009, the pension amount was increased by 11.4 percent. Even the official propaganda has, in the same period from a price increase of 17.5 percent. The value of the pension is reduced accordingly by at least 6 percent. Who has to return there as a very nasty rants about gossips or propagandist are called.
must at this point, of course, be mentioned that in addition to the retiree health insurance subsidies to receive his pension. Who reckons these payments in the return of cheating but the second time, as the contributors of course, has been paid for decades large contributions in the health insurance benefits without having to take to complete.
Although each Mietmaul and constitutional judges should be aware that the greatest amount of health insurance for the treatment of the last 2 years of a human life is used, that fact is of course never discussed in this context. Against this background, the system change in health insurance with additional contributions and participation and self-limited "employer contributions" a monstrous fraud.
The "Constitutional Court" but also justify this "expropriation" of the people with their pseudo-law, should it dare anyone to rebel against it!
small sideshow: A
ALGII receiver wins 500 Euro at the "action man". His ALGII reference is then reduced to two months to be 250 €, even though the "lucky" in the course of several years, more than pay up the 500 €. The judges found it quite correctly. The cost of the lot in the month of the gain could be the "lucky" but remove the requirement of the consortium.
It is unbelievable but true! ;-)
0 comments:
Post a Comment